"A woman simply needs male guidance"
The psychologist and behavioral scientist Dr. Eberhard Hülscher is considered an outsider among his peers. His female colleagues in particular react violently to his theses. He provokes the Greens, Leftists and Socialists, and there are loud calls for a professional ban. But his seminars are just as fully booked as his lectures at the university.
When you hear Hülscher's theses, it quickly becomes clear why the reactions from the left corner are so violent. The man is right in much of what he says, and that hardly evokes the applause of women who like to talk about emancipation and sincerely believe that the future is female.
"There are definitely women who do outstanding things in their profession," says Dr. Hülscher. But if you take a closer look, there are only very few who stand out from the crowd. The vast majority of women rarely pursue specific professional goals.” The number of female students has increased steadily in recent years, but at 40% is still below average. In addition, the professional decisions of women are determined emotionally to a large extent and lie in areas such as psychology, physiology, journalism and media studies. So young women want to learn what women have always been good at. They want to help, care, mediate and communicate.
"That also explains the gender pay gap," says Hülscher. “Women do not study to have a career and earn as much money as possible. They study what suits them and that translates into helping functions and practical work with people. Only a few make it to a doctorate and women in the management are rather rare.”
Humans cannot really separate themselves from their genetic predisposition, and genetics clearly says that men and women are by no means the same, but fundamentally different. "With absolutely the same activity, different brain areas are activated in men and women," says brain research and Dr. Hülscher agrees. This explains the completely different reactions of men and women to everyday situations.
Statistics also says that the majority of women with above-average professional training either never really enter the workforce, reorient themselves after just a few years or leave the job market entirely. Employers can therefore not be blamed if they would rather hire a man who takes his career seriously than try a woman who will soon change her mind and give in to her natural impulse and become a mother.
A man strives for leadership and not only in professional life. He wants to make a career, to realize himself, to excel and to be in the limelight. A woman may be good at her job, but she is often content to work in the background and act as directed. Men always have great problems working under a woman. For women, having a male boss is completely normal and most of them even prefer it that way
“Being second is just better for women because that's what they've been practicing for thousands of years. It is firmly anchored in their consciousness that the man is the leader, while the woman lets himself be led by him," Hülscher explains the context. Contrary to the pseudoscience called Gender Studies, there are not only very clear biological differences between men and women, which only a completely twisted mind will deny. The psyche is also completely different. While heavy hormone treatments and surgical procedures can alter sexual organs, a man will never be able to bear children and a woman simply cannot father them.
"The life of man and woman is shaped by biological and psychological differences that go back to an infinitely long history of development," is therefore the only logical explanation that Dr. Hülscher represents. Up until the 1960s, no one doubted these differences. Men were men and women were women. There were some aberrations of nature, but they were the absolute exception. The fact that men only love men and women like women was also considered an exception to the rule, and declaring homosexuality illegal has never been able to change anything.
What messed it all up was the contraceptive pill, which had been developed in the concentration camps during the Nazi era and, after the war, triumphed in America and spilled over to Europe. This allowed women to decide for the first time whether they wanted to become pregnant or not. Sex was no longer a brief pleasure followed by a long pregnancy and years of childhood. Sex was for the first time viewed as a pure source of lust that could be enjoyed without hesitation as long as the woman took her hormones properly.
But the old genetics hadn't changed because of it. Women were still women and therefore decisively different from men. They thought like women, felt like women, and acted like women. And most of them couldn't really handle their new freedom. They could have sex with any man at any time without fear of consequences. But the needs that were firmly anchored in human consciousness were by no means eliminated. Neither on the male nor on the female side.
Because the man was still programmed to hunt and possess. He wanted exactly the woman who aroused him and he didn't just want to use her, he wanted to own her in the absolute sense of the word. She should belong to him alone, be there exclusively for him and satisfy only his lust. He wanted to be able to dispose of her at any time, determine her fate and rule over her. Because equality between men and women sounds good, but it has nothing to do with actual needs and desires.
The ideal of man is still possession. That's why he talks about "his" house, "his" wife and "his" children and he has no problem taking care of the whole family and bringing in the money on which everyone can live well. The woman, on the other hand, has no inherent difficulty in being dependent on him and being defined by him. She therefore likes to use the “we” form when speaking of “our” house, “our” children and “our” life. She also spends the money he has earned without hesitation, because it is "our" money. Her whole life revolves around her husband and children and only at the very end comes the self.
In the western world, women like to portray things differently and above all emphasize how free, independent and emancipated they are. After all, they were persuaded from an early age that they were their husbands' "partners" and that they should see each other as equals. But in reality they are actually quite comfortable with his money, his care, his guidance, and his rule.
The result is an illusory world of words that have little to do with what women really want, need and hope for. Aspiration and reality therefore have very little to do with each other. In reality, there is nothing behind the much-vaunted sense of unity other than rock-hard power structures and dependencies. She is allowed to drive the chic small car that she uses to pick up the kids from school and will call it “my” car. But in reality he bought it. He also pays the insurance, the taxes and every gas bill for it. And he can also take it away from her at any time if he sees a reason to do so. The house officially belongs to both of them and both are also in the land register. But if he stops making the monthly payments, she'll be out of it within months, and that much-vaunted sense of unity will be gone.
The life of a married woman is therefore a pure illusion that her husband alone can burst overnight.
In the rest of the world, women have far fewer illusions. They know they can hardly live without a man. They also know that they should only have children if there is a man in their life who will take care of them. They are aware that their whole life will revolve around this man and they have reason to be glad and happy when they have found one who not only cares for them but is good to them and them doesn't beat them too often.
These women have learned that they live in a man's world that hasn't changed much throughout the millennia. The man is in charge. The man is the undisputed master of the house. The man is the father and educator of his children. The man is the ruler of the woman and children, and he alone decides when it is time to love, and when it is time to punish. The Japanese student bows respectfully to her teacher before obediently lying down on the penalty bench waiting for the first stroke of the wooden paddle. The Indian wife follows her husband into his house to serve her mother-in-law, who will make sure that the young woman is regularly punished by her husband just because it satisfies her to hear the young woman scream.
However, more and more couples in this country are recognizing a lifestyle that is absolutely normal in large parts of the world and is known in the western world under the label of domestic discipline. Couples who have recognized that every form of human coexistence and joint work requires structure and hierarchy. After an orderly hand. After one who is in charge and others who submit to him. For a strong man who sets the course and makes the decisions, and a woman who supports him and is unreservedly devoted to him. According to clear rules and sensitive penalties if these are not observed.
“Even if this does not correspond to the zeitgeist, objectively speaking, women are fundamentally weaker than men. Not only physically, but above all in terms of their mental resilience. Together they can complement each other ideally and form a perfect team. But the potential for abuse is great and it takes a man of steadfast character who will not succumb to the temptation to abuse his own strength and exploit the woman's obvious weaknesses," summarizes Dr. Shuffle the situation together.
